Suchergebnisse

• Zeitschriftenartikel aus "PinG Privacy in Germany" Ausgabe 1/2016

  Safe Harbor invalidated – What next?

  Paul Voigt, Jeremiah Posedel

  …landmark decision 1 of the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”) following a request for a preliminary ruling by the Irish High Court 2 , on 6 October 2015, Safe… …whether (1) a national Data Protection Authority is bound by a European Commission adequacy finding when complaints allege that the involved third country… …investigations in light of new factual developments since Safe Harbor. 4 1 Matter C-362/14. 2 Judgement of 18 June 2014, – 2013/765 JR –. 3 europe-v-facebook.org/… …41 II. Findings of the ECJ The ECJ both strengthened the position of the national Data Protection Authorities and declared Safe Harbor void. 1… …certainty is likely not to be achieved before February 2016. 1. Article 29 Working Party On 16 October 2015, the Art. 29 Working Party 22 issued a statement… …concerns about the transfer of data to the United States. ” 1. Existing Safeguards Although the Schrems opinion raises many valid concerns, the European… …Amendments Act, does set forth privacy protections applicable to Europeans. Specifically, ­under FISA, (1) surveillance targeting must be for a valid foreign… …Privacy Act – which will be extended to covered EU citizens if the Judicial Redress Act is passed – are to (1) restrict disclosure of personally… …Act, an EU citizen can sue a federal entity if the entity (1) discloses the individual’s records in a manner that violates the Privacy Act, (2) refuses…

  Alle Treffer im Inhalt anzeigen